1a. The claim that the author is trying
to make is that gun control laws should be enacted because when handled
improperly, tragedies occur.
1b. There is a clear thesis in the
first paragraph which states, “there should be more gun control in certain
aspects, such as safety courses and general firearm education.
2a. The reasons that are given to
support the claim are that liabilities occur if a firearm is handled improperly
due to ignorance, accidental shootings could be more prevented, and finally
education is the key to preventing fatal gun incidents.
2b. The evidence is that in WA state
there are almost no restrictions on gun purchasing. Also, there was a story
about a young boy who died after unintentionally shooting himself. There were
also other stats about accidental shootings.
2c. The reasons are very sufficient
because these are real examples of people getting access to guns, who should
have never been able to reach/and or touch them in the first place. Also, the
fact that there are little restrictions of the purchasing of guns in our state,
is a major example to support the authors claim.
3a. The only counterargument was that
implementing gun control will not stop homicide, and/or other crimes. The
author deals with them by stating that “In the end, the bad guys are going to
be the ones who continue to carry and abuse, and the good guys…have the
intention to use their guns in a safe and responsible manner.”
3b. See above^
3c. The author does treat the argument respectively,
and responds by saying that “educating the public will inform the majority of
good gun owners to use their guns in the most responsible way.”
3d. The arguments are appropriately
qualified.
4a. There are 9 sources the author has
used, each used either as a statistic, news incidents, or studies on gun laws.
4b. All the sources are credible because
they are all facts. There’s no way to change statistics, and in terms of
studies and stories on the news, they are only as reliable as the source, which
all are factual in this case.
4c. All the sources are dated from 2014
and 2015.
5a. It seems that the author assumes
everyone has heard what has been going on with gun control laws in the past few
years, there’s no definition as to what it really means, because it’s well assumed
everyone knows at least a bit about the current uproar of gun control.
5b. The word we isn’t exactly mentioned,
but the tone and other words included do help to tie the reader in and make
them feel like this is an issue they should be concerned about.
5c. I definitely share the beliefs of this author. People are
entitled to purchase what they please, no one can really stop them from that.
If a gun is an important purchase for you, for protection or animal hunting
purposes, I don’t have the right to deny you of that. But ample education and safety
courses should always be implemented, as well as background checks whenever
purchasing a gun.
No comments:
Post a Comment