Suffrage
in Our Home Country-Homelessness and Living in Poverty
Approximately 3.5 million
Americans, 1.35 million of them being children, are expected to experience homelessness
in a given year. (National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, 2003).
Homelessness and poverty are two diverse situations, but both entail suffrage.
No one deserves to be deprived of a home, but people are losing them daily.
With the escalating costs of basic needs, it is becoming exceptionally challenging
to earn a living in today’s economy. It just solely doesn’t seem fair that even
with a job; living in poverty and/or being homeless is still a concern. But, in
the United States this is a factual statement for many Americans. Children
shouldn’t be deprived of a meal merely because their parent(s) cannot afford to
feed them dinner that night. There are numerous amounts of reasons as to why
people plummet into poverty; but there are also plenty of things America can do
to help.
The most basic reasoning as to why
people end up homeless or in extreme poverty is drug and alcohol abuse. In
fact, two thirds of homeless people do have a problem with substance/drug
abuse. (Leal, 2009). But, instead of shaming those who make these choices and
suffer the consequences, there must be support provided to those in these circumstances.
Mental illness, loss of a job, and/or highered cost of rent are also common causes
for homelessness and poverty, which aren’t always that exact persons fault. We
as a country need to tend to the needs of these people, instead of watching our
brothers and sisters fall deeper and deeper into suffrage.
A major
reason as to why this country has even gotten itself into this mess is that
funding has majorly dwindled for low income homes. In 1970, there was a
surplus of 300,000 affordable housing units in
the U.S. But then, in the 1980s, affordable housing began to evaporate. The
Reagan administration slashed funding. Federal spending on housing assistance fell by 50
percent between 1976 and 2002. At the same time,
gentrification sped up, with cities getting rid of cheap housing like single
room occupancy units and replacing them with more expensive stock, and units
being built were more often for co-ops and condos for ownership instead of
rent. (Covert, 2013) This explains the increase of people on the street. It
simply is not right that low income housing options are not easily attained.
The people in this country range from poor to rich, and everywhere in between.
In order to care for our people we must give them options. If one cannot afford
rent even with a job, why does it seem suitable for their only choice to be to
live on the streets?
After
discussing why it is crucial to put an end to homelessness and poverty as well
as the trials and tribulations along the way, it is appropriate to confer how to
take a stand on homelessness, as well as how to decrease poverty. The simple reasoning
is that in order to aid to each other, we must first make sure we are secure.
To elaborate, one cannot help another if that individual still needs to help
oneself. Why is it that Selena Gomez can rack in 3 million a year, yet many
Americans find it problematic to earn over 10 dollars an hour? The response is simple;
our priorities are downright messed up. The millions of dollars shelled out
every year to simply deliver entertainment must stop, and a surplus of money
must be implemented to help the bulk of our people. There are more people
homeless/living in poverty than there are celebrities, so why not direct our
money towards assisting them?
The topic
of homelessness and poverty will be never ending. It will always exist in America;
because that’s the tone that was set many years ago. The idea that paying
professional football players millions, is
more important than being confident that that high school football player will
or will not be provided a meal that night, is simply devastating. Americans are
too consumed with themselves and their blingy cars and gigantic homes to even
open their eyes to those in need.
Works Cited
"National
Poverty Center | University of Michigan." RSS. Ed. Robert Michael
and Contance Citro. National Academy
Press, 2003. Web. 24 Nov. 2015. <http://www.npc.umich.edu/poverty/#TOP>.
Covert,
Bryce. "It Would Actually Be Very Simple To End Homelessness
Forever." It Would Actually Be Very Simple To End Homelessness Forever
Comments. Think Progress, 09 Oct. 2014. Web. 24 Nov. 2015.
<http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/10/09/3577980/end-homelessness/>.
Leal,
Daniel, Marc Galanter, Helen Dermatis, and Laurence Westreich. "Correlates
of Protracted Homelessness in a Sample of Dually Diagnosed Psychiatric
Inpatients." Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 16.2 (1999):
143-47. Substance Abuse and Homelessness. National Coalition for the
Homeless, July 2009. Web. 23 Nov. 2015.
<http://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/addiction.pdf>.
No comments:
Post a Comment